Housing cooperatives: Avoiding disciplinary sanctions
— Laurent Bigard
In Quebec's housing cooperatives, suspension and exclusion remain the two ultimate disciplinary measures that a board of directors can impose on a member who fails to meet their commitments. These measures, strictly governed by the Cooperative Act, should never be the first reflex of a well-managed cooperative.
After years of working with housing cooperatives in Montérégie, we have observed a worrying reality: too many conflicts leading to sanctions could have been avoided by simple prevention and education work. A poorly informed member is not necessarily a member acting in bad faith.
This article offers a reflection on a belief we defend: before initiating a disciplinary procedure with sometimes devastating consequences, it is essential to ensure that the functioning of cooperative life has been properly understood by everyone.
The legal framework for disciplinary measures
Quebec's Cooperative Act strictly regulates the imposition of a suspension or exclusion. This formalism is not a bureaucratic obstacle: it protects the member against arbitrary decisions and protects the cooperative against appeals.
In practice, a compliant disciplinary procedure requires compliance with several fundamental principles:
- A serious and documented reason related to a real breach of the member's obligations;
- A written notice clearly stating the facts complained of;
- The right to be heard before any final decision is made;
- A reasoned decision by the board of directors, made in good faith.
Failure to comply with these steps weakens the process and exposes the cooperative to a challenge. This is a topic we regularly address in our comprehensive guide to cooperative governance for new administrators, as mastering the legal framework is a board's primary responsibility.
The reality on the ground: an underestimated human impact
A disciplinary measure is, by its very nature, a corrective measure. But its effect on the member's daily life can be brutal. The loss of the member discount, for example, results in an immediate and substantial increase in rent.
For a household with a modest income — a common profile in our housing cooperatives — this financial consequence can become simply devastating. We are no longer talking about a simple administrative sanction, but about a direct threat to a family's residential stability.
When conflict hides a misunderstanding
Our experience shows that a significant proportion of the breaches complained of stem not from a desire to cause harm, but from a lack of knowledge of the rules of cooperative play. The member was unaware of their obligations, or misunderstood them at the time of joining.
This phenomenon is exacerbated when member selection has been carried out too quickly, without a proper presentation of collective responsibilities. The member has signed up, but the cooperative culture has never really been passed on to them.
Our position: prevention before punishment
We take a clear position: in most cases, the preventive measure should precede the disciplinary measure. Punishing a member who has never understood the fundamentals of cooperative living is like correcting a symptom without treating the cause.
Over time, it also happens that the democratic functioning of a cooperative fades away. New generations of members reproduce habits without knowing their meaning. Prevention then consists in reactivating this collective memory before tensions degenerate.
This approach is consistent with the findings we shared in our analysis of cooperative challenges and how to overcome them: most internal crises stem from a lack of shared understanding.
Concrete recommendations for cooperatives
Based on our experience, here is the sequence to prioritize before considering any formal sanction:
- Meet with the member to understand the actual situation and identify the origin of the breach;
- Remind them of the rules and check that they have been properly understood and explained;
- Offer support or training to fill the knowledge gap;
- Use mediation when the conflict involves several parties;
- Document each step to demonstrate the cooperative's good faith;
- Reserve sanctions for situations where prevention has truly failed.
This gradation protects both the member and the cooperative. It transforms a punitive process into an educational approach, while respecting the requirements of the Cooperative Act.
Looking to the future
We predict that housing cooperatives that invest in the ongoing training of their members will significantly reduce their disciplinary procedures in the coming years. Prevention is not a cost, it is an investment in the cohesion and sustainability of the living environment.
A certified training program to reconnect with co-op values
It is precisely to meet this need that FECHAM offers its certified training program “Introduction to Cooperative Life: Understanding and Engaging in Your Housing Co-op”. This training allows a member to (re)discover the fundamentals, rights and responsibilities of cooperative life.
By directing a member to this training rather than to an immediate sanction, your board offers a real second chance: that of reconnecting with cooperative values and avoiding a coercive measure with lasting consequences. It complements perfectly our online training catalogue for housing cooperatives.
Administrators, selection committees and members themselves find a common language here, which guarantees a harmonious and democratic living environment.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between suspending and excluding a member?
Suspension is a temporary measure that withdraws certain rights from the member for a specified period, while exclusion definitively terminates their membership status. Both are governed by the Cooperative Act and require a rigorous procedure.
Is a cooperative required to attempt prevention before imposing a sanction?
The law does not formally require a preventive step, but it does require that the member be heard and that the decision be reasoned and made in good faith. Prevention strengthens this good faith and greatly reduces the risk of challenge.
Is the loss of the member discount automatic in case of breach?
No. This consequence depends on the internal regulations of each cooperative and on the nature of the breach. It can only be applied after a compliant procedure, which underlines the importance of well-documented support.
How can FECHAM help our cooperative in these situations?
FECHAM offers governance support, mediation services and certified training, including “Introduction to Cooperative Life”. Our team supports housing cooperatives in Montérégie to prevent conflicts and secure disciplinary procedures.
Introduction à la vie coopérative : Comprendre et s'engager dans sa coop d'habitation
Une formation certifiante essentielle pour maîtriser les fondements du modèle coopératif d'habitation au Québec. Découvrez les rôles, les règlements et les principes qui font vivre votre coop au quotidien.
63.7$
Voir nos formations →